First and foremost: It was better than I expected. Itâ€™s not totally worthless. Butâ€¦
Ghostbusters 2016 can easily be dismissed as a â€ślazy, uninspired rehash of pre-existing iconographyâ€ť, as I read elsewhere, which is true when it comes to all Hollywood remakes/reboots, but it cannot be dismissed just because there are female leads (as Iâ€™ve read countless of times); thatâ€™s just plain stupid.
For me, this is fairly easy: There are different kinds of comedy, and comparing the reboot with the original, anyone should be able to spot the difference.
I watched the original Ghostbusters (1984) the other day and I enjoyed it like I did when I was 9 years old. Nostalgia, but even more than that: Itâ€™s my kind of comedy. The subtle humor courtesy of Egon Spengler and Peter Venkman is hitherto unsurpassed in my book. It still holds up.
32 years later, Ghostbusters is the total opposite of subtlety. Itâ€™s like that annoying, loud, attention seeking idiot in highschool trying way too hard to be quirky, making funny faces and stupid voices 24/7. STFU, please.
The humor is at surface level at best. I mean, fart jokes? Really? Or to be more precise: Queef jokes. I think â€ścringeworthyâ€ť is the word here. And â€śface palmâ€ť. And thatâ€™s just the beginning. (And Iâ€™m not even going to start with gender politics here. Or cheap product placement. Or the awful business people at Sony (stop making movies, you twats). I could write an essay, but thatâ€™s already been done.)
With that said, the ensemble cast probably made the best of a very weak script. Paul Feig fucked it up.
As for the comedy: I laughed three times (the hot dog logo, the Jaws joke and the man shriekingâ€¦), which makes it obvious. This wasnâ€™t made for me.
Rated: 1,5 /5